The NCAA's investigation into Oregon's relationship with scout Willie Lyles will not reach summary…
Not So Fast Chip; You May Owe Us
While some are viewing this delay as a negative development regarding any potential outcome, most understand and have stated that due to the complexities of the Oregon case coupled with the precedent the NCAA is looking to set regarding "third parties," a hearing was essentially inevitable so as to clearly state parameters for future cases involving recruiting services, 7-On-7 camps, and mentors of prospective student athletes. However, because there will be a hearing, Chip Kelly and his coaching staff will likely have to give testimony and missteps regarding the rules will almost certainly come to light, the coach responsible for Oregon's leap in relevancy will be left having to own his role in the virtually assured discipline which will ensue -- which is why I think he owes it to the school, the athletic department, and the players he put in this position to steer them through the mine field he himself knowingly laid.
Oregon's case is different. The Ducks are not (by most reputable accounts) going to be forced to terminate Chip, nor does what they've allegedly done (by most reputable accounts) suggest scandalous acts detrimental to the reputation of the university as a whole (i.e. paying players, cheating in the classroom, etc.), but – if true - it was wrong and if Chip Kelly is responsible – as he seems to be – he should reap what he sowed. However, should he be forced to put his career on hold (i.e. refuse an NFL position) for merely pushing the envelope in the interests of success? I'm not suggesting he should be forced to do anything, just suggesting that in the interests of the same ethics he preaches to his players, it would go a long way if he chose to suffer through the same penalties they'll be forced to suffer through.
After-all, there's something dirty about making a ***t sandwich, only to watch someone else have to eat it.
I've said from the beginning of this nearly two years ago, that what I believe occurred in the Willie Lyles case was an attempt by the football program to circumnavigate the rules through a loophole in the system. I also believe in some way, shape, or form it was common practice by virtually every relatively competitive program in the FBS. None of that makes it right, but all of it makes it survival in a game designed to be played that way. Life is looking for advantages, some have them built-in (i.e. locale's in fertile recruiting areas like Florida, Texas or California) and others have to create them by outside-the-box thinking. Oregon did that, and now how they did it has come into question.
Don't get me wrong: I believe Chip Kelly is and has been a great coach for Oregon; and as an outsider appreciates all that he's done for the program. Remarkably – and sadly - , he's made Mike Bellotti an afterthought due to a level of success few in the game can boast. What he's done and has sustained over his relatively short run at Oregon is but a pipedream for the majority of FBS programs, and he's made it look easy in the process. Sure, he's a bit rigid off the field and for those whose job it is to cover him can be an industrial-sized thorn in their side, but everyone has to march to the beat of their own drummer and Chip will always be more Belichick than Carroll. And Pete Carroll left when the going got tough and has taken a share of heat for doing just that. Chip? He can do better, or at least has the chance to. He doesn't have to skip town. He doesn't have to leave the young men he recruited and coached behind. And he doesn't have to put his successor behind an eight-ball of his doing. He can see it through, and salvage his legacy in the process.
If Coach Kelly leaves for the NFL, the college game will remember his record, his offense, and many of his coaching techniques that have made even the best coaches question how they do it. But they'll also remember Willie Lyles, a $25,000 check, and whatever punishment the NCAA has in-store for the school and players he'll be leaving behind. I wouldn't want to be remembered that way, I have to think Chip wouldn't either, but if he does…maybe you'd rather see him walk away, rather than pay the debt he's likely accrued.
Chip Kelly is a great coach, such is indisputable, but is he a great man…we'll know soon enough.
USCFootball.com Recommended Stories
USC vs. UCLA Preview
It’s “The Next Episode” between USC and UCLA, but more than just bragging rights are on the line.Read More
Week 12: Super Sleepers
Every week, Fantasy Football Expert Jeb Gorham digs in his list of rankings to find the best sleepers for deeper formats. Consider giving these players a chance, but be aware of the risks! Since the…Read More
Peristyle Podcast: UCLA Preview
It is rivalry week on the Peristyle Podcast so we welcome on Dave Woods, beat reporter from BruinReportOnline.com to get his thoughts on this critical matchup between USC and UCLA.Read More
Every body helps but it will take eyes too
Trojans aim to make it a team game in taking on Brett Hundley and the UCLA Bruins' offense Saturday. One set of eyes or one "spy" guy won't be enough to pull that off.Read More
Hardin blasts Goodell over Peterson case
Adrian Peterson’s defense attorney Rusty Hardin blasted the NFL commissioner over his handling of Peterson’s suspension, saying he is trying to make up for the NFL’s handling of the Ray Rice situation…Read More